A System for text analysis
When you are analysing text you
have to do two things. First, you need to recognise what is there, then,
using your knowledge of language, you need to decide why it is there. It
is not enough to list how many complex sentences there are, calculate the ratio
of passive to active structures and mention a preference for pre- over
post-modification. Nor is it enough to say that a text ‘moves' you,
‘clarifies matters well' , 'really grabs your attention' or ‘sounds
sarcastic'. You are allowed to have personal response and it doesn't do any harm
to be able to recognise features, but the only way to do a fair and thorough
analysis of any text is to use a system.
The exact details of your own system should be evolved by you, and you ought to
keep it as flexible as possible. It will have to allow for the major differences
between spoken and written language. This system can be used both with written
and prepared spoken (as in a speech or rehearsed interview.)
Audience (Who was this written for?) Is the target audience sophisticated well-educated young or old? specialist or not?
Purpose (What was the writer's intention?) Was (s)he attempting to entertain? persuade? inform? instruct? do several things at once?
Tone (How
did the writer sound?) Did (s)he seem to you to have a personality? If not, why
not? If so, of what type? Did she seem to be factual or emotional? consistent?
direct or subtle?
Audience (Educational level/degree of sophistication)
Words Latinate or Anglo-Saxon? any foreign words? any idioms and clichés?
Structures
simple or complex? (look at clauses) very long or short sentences? word
order usual? (e.g. subject-verb)
Age
Words very simple vocabulary for children? slang associated with a certain period and thus age group? archaisms? formal or colloquial?
Structures
simple co-ordinators like 'and' exclamations for teenagers elegant
variation (i.e. numerous subordinate clauses)
Specialism
Words specialist/technical terms insider language
Structures
layout including charts. flow-charts, diagrams, tables etc. unusual
syntax
Purpose (Entertaining)
Words humour through puns phonological effects 'bad' language nonsense words
Structures
alliteration and assonance form not the same as function (effect
is ironic) variety of structure to maintain interest
(Entertaining
is by far the hardest category to talk about. Look out for unusual words and
structures which amuse or interest you. Sequencing - the order in which things
are written - is also important.)
Persuading
Words emotive and extreme language (look at adjectives and adverbs carefully) ‘loaded' words (look at verbs)
Structures repetition for effect rhetorical questions question and answer exclamatory sentences two-part, balanced sentences
Informing
Words precise labels (nouns) prepositions (specifying inter-relations.) factual adjectives adverbials of time and place
Structures
sequencing declarative sentences lists tables
Instructive
Words prepositions 'a'/'the' distinction important adverbs of manner, time and place
Structures
imperative mood verbs sequencing format: sub-sections
Personality (Remember that the writer may be speaking as a persona and not as herself try not to confuse the two.)
Words hyperbolic (exaggerated) or understated; assertive e.g. 'I think' as opposed to 'it seems to me' ; anxious - question tags muddled or clear (look at nouns); attitude to others (look at nouns) ; attitude to others (look at adjectives); colloquial and chatty or formal? original - unusual collocations ; unconventional - taboo words
Structures
active (involved) or passive (objective)? first person or third person?
personal? (lots of ‘I’s and 'me's)
Is the tone sophisticated or simple?
Words long and Latinate? jokes, puns and plays on words? jargon? specialist language or simple?
Structures
short statements or long, complex sentences? simple co-ordination or lots
of subordination?
'stream of consciousness' - where the writer shares their thought process with
the reader? any asides? - jokey or informational?
Is the tone factual or emotional?
Words nouns mainly concrete or abstract? adjectives and adverbs informing or directing? articles or possessive pronouns? ('the country' or 'my country'?)
Structures
declaratives or exclamations/questions and answers?
lists for precision? detailed post-modification? long, reflective passages or snappy sentences? layout - numbered and
ordered or anarchic?
Is
the tone consistent?
Does the style remain the same
throughout or are there shifts? If there are, can you suggest why?
Does a simple, emotional opening attract your sympathy before the complexities
are introduced?
Or does an attempt to be factual disappear as the writer's bias comes through?
Are changes deliberate or a failure?
When
you have collected your evidence by looking closely at words and structures, you
will be in a position to write an informed, fair appraisal of the text. Plan
what you are going to say: decide what your overall opinion of the text is, as
well as dealing with how effectively it addresses its chosen audience, whether
it achieves its purpose and whether you feel it adopts a suitable and
appropriate tone. When you have completed your analysis, look at what you have
written:
Is it well-ordered and thus
clear?
Is it an expression of your
personality - if you want it to be?
Is it thorough or vague?
Is it linguistic - i.e. have
you used the appropriate specialist terms?